The Rise of Quiet Quitting
The term “quiet quitting” has become a hot topic in offices, online forums, and even mainstream media. But what does it really mean? Is it a mass exodus of disengaged employees, a passive form of protest, or simply a new name for an old concept?
At its core, quiet quitting is about doing the bare minimum at work—fulfilling your job description without going above and beyond. It’s about setting clear boundaries, prioritizing personal time, and resisting the pressure to be “always on.”
Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Healthy Boundaries: What’s the Difference?
The term “quiet quitting” is misleading. It implies secrecy or dishonesty, painting the quiet quitter as someone not pulling their weight. However, this interpretation misses a crucial point: the importance of setting healthy boundaries.
There’s a difference between disengagement and establishing reasonable limits:
Quiet Quitting:
This often involves a negative attitude shift. The employee might be checked out, cynical, and unwilling to contribute beyond the absolute minimum. There’s a sense of resentment or apathy towards their work.
Setting Boundaries:
This is a proactive and healthy approach. It’s about clearly communicating your limits, prioritizing your well-being, and focusing on achieving a sustainable work-life balance. It’s not about doing less; it’s about working smarter and protecting your personal time.
Leave a Reply