Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? What the Latest Work Trend Really Means

At its core, “quiet quitting” refers to the act of doing the bare minimum at work. Employees engaging in this trend are not necessarily walking out the door, but they are mentally checking out. They stick to their job descriptions, avoid taking on extra responsibilities, and prioritize their personal time over going above and beyond for their employer.

This trend has emerged in the wake of several converging factors:

• Burnout: The pandemic, coupled with an always-on work culture, has left many feeling overworked and emotionally drained.
• The Great Resignation: Witnessing colleagues leave for greener pastures has prompted some to re-evaluate their own priorities and seek greater work-life balance.
• Shifting Power Dynamics: With the rise of remote work and a competitive job market, employees have more leverage than ever to demand better treatment and set boundaries.

Setting Boundaries or Shirking Responsibility?

The debate surrounding “quiet quitting” hinges on whether it’s simply a new term for setting healthy boundaries or a sign of employee disengagement and a lack of work ethic.

Those who view it as setting boundaries argue that employees are well within their rights to establish clear lines between their professional and personal lives. They believe that dedicating time for rest, hobbies, and personal pursuits ultimately makes for happier and more productive individuals. This perspective emphasizes the importance of work-life balance and challenges the expectation of constant availability and overworking.

Conversely, critics argue that “quiet quitting” fosters a culture of mediocrity and can hinder career progression. They contend that going the extra mile is often what differentiates those who excel from those who merely coast. This viewpoint emphasizes the importance of commitment, initiative, and exceeding expectations in the workplace.