The Rise of “Quiet Quitting”: A New Name for an Old Struggle?
The internet is buzzing with talk of “quiet quitting.” But is it a revolutionary act of self-preservation or simply a new term for an age-old workplace struggle? This trend, which centers around employees doing the bare minimum required of their jobs and no more, has sparked a debate about employee engagement, work-life balance, and the very nature of work itself.
Understanding the Context: Burnout, Hustle Culture, and the Great Resignation
To understand “quiet quitting,” we must first acknowledge the context in which it emerged. The past few years have been tumultuous, to say the least. The pandemic blurred the lines between work and home life, leading to widespread burnout and a reassessment of priorities. This period, often called “The Great Resignation,” saw millions of employees voluntarily leaving their jobs, many in search of better work-life balance, higher pay, and more fulfilling roles.
Simultaneously, “hustle culture” – the glorification of overworking and constant productivity – continued to permeate many industries. This clash between the desire for a more balanced life and the pressure to constantly perform created fertile ground for “quiet quitting” to take root.
Leave a Reply