Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Are We Glorifying Burnout or Embracing Self-Care?
The Quiet Resignation: A New Workplace Trend
Remember “The Great Resignation,” when employees left jobs for better opportunities and work-life balance? Now, there’s “Quiet Quitting,” a buzzword sparking debate about employee expectations, company culture, and work-life boundaries.
“Quiet quitting” means employees doing the bare minimum, not exceeding expectations. Some call it disengagement; others call it self-preservation in demanding cultures. This is where “setting boundaries” comes in – clearly communicating limits on workload and availability, advocating for well-being while staying a valuable team member.
Quiet Quitting or Healthy Boundaries? Decoding the Dilemma
The difference lies in approach and intention:
Quiet Quitting:
- Passive Resistance: Disengagement, lack of communication.
- Internalized Frustration: Driven by resentment, burnout, feeling undervalued.
- Potential Career Impact: Lack of initiative can be misinterpreted, hindering advancement.
Setting Boundaries:
- Proactive Communication: Openly communicating limits and expectations to supervisors and colleagues.
- Prioritizing Well-being: Creating sustainable work-life balance, preventing burnout.
- Fostering Respect: Clear communication builds a healthier work environment considering everyone’s needs.
Leave a Reply