The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“: A New Term, an Old Struggle?
The term “quiet quitting” has exploded in popularity, sparking debates about work-life balance. But is this really a new phenomenon? Or is it just a new name for an age-old struggle?
“Quiet quitting” emerged as a reaction to this unsustainable culture. It’s seen as a way for employees to reclaim their time and prioritize well-being, even if it means doing the bare minimum at work.
Quiet Quitting vs. Boundary Setting: What’s the Difference?
The key is understanding the difference between “quiet quitting” and simply setting healthy boundaries.
Quiet Quitting: Disengagement and Its Impact
Quiet Quitting often involves:
- Neglecting tasks and responsibilities
- Disengaging from projects and teams
- Showing a lack of enthusiasm and initiative
This can negatively impact team morale and productivity.
Boundary Setting: Prioritizing Well-being Professionally
Boundary Setting involves:
- Clearly communicating your limits and availability
- Prioritizing personal time and commitments
- Declining requests that fall outside your job description
This fosters a healthier work-life balance without compromising professionalism.
Leave a Reply