The phrase itself is a bit of a misnomer. “Quiet quitting” doesn’t actually involve quitting your job at all. Instead, it describes the act of doing the bare minimum at work, no longer going above and beyond, and mentally checking out.

This can manifest in various ways, including:

• Strictly adhering to work hours and refusing to answer emails or calls outside of them.
• Declining extra projects or responsibilities beyond the job description.
• Showing less enthusiasm or initiative in team meetings.
• Prioritizing personal time and well-being over work commitments.

While some argue this signifies a disengaged and unproductive workforce, others see it as a necessary response to increasingly demanding work environments and a culture of overwork.

Quiet Quitting vs. Healthy Boundaries: Where’s the Line?

The critical distinction lies in intention and impact. There’s a difference between setting healthy boundaries and actively disengaging from your job.

What are Healthy Boundaries at Work?

Establishing healthy work-life boundaries means prioritizing your well-being and setting limits to prevent burnout. It’s about protecting your time and energy, ensuring you have space for personal life, hobbies, and rest. This approach benefits both the employee and employer, fostering sustainable productivity and job satisfaction.

Is Quiet Quitting Ever Justified?

Quiet quitting, however, implies a level of resentment or apathy towards one’s job. It’s about doing the bare minimum without any desire to contribute or grow. While understandable in toxic work environments, this approach can be detrimental in the long run, hindering career progression and potentially impacting team morale.