Let’s break it down. “Quiet quitting” is generally understood as doing the bare minimum at work, fulfilling your job description without going above and beyond. It’s about mentally checking out while still physically clocking in. On the other hand, “setting boundaries” implies establishing clear limits to protect your time, energy, and well-being. This can include declining extra work, not answering emails after hours, or taking regular breaks.

The lines between these concepts can become blurry. Is refusing to work late “quiet quitting” or simply setting a healthy boundary? The answer, as with most things, is nuanced.

Why the Confusion? Analyzing the Disconnect

The conflation of “quiet quitting” and “setting boundaries” reveals a deeper issue: the expectation of overworking in many workplaces. When simply doing your job is perceived as “quitting,” it suggests a culture where going above and beyond is the norm, not the exception. This can lead to burnout, resentment, and a lack of work-life balance.

Reasons for Misusing the Terms:

• Stigma around boundaries: Admitting you need to set boundaries can be perceived as weakness in some work environments.
• Fear of repercussions: Employees may fear being labeled as “difficult” or passed over for opportunities if they enforce boundaries.
• Lack of clear expectations: The line between “going the extra mile” and simply doing your job can be ambiguous.

Beyond Quiet Quitting: It’s About Thriving, Not Just Surviving

I believe the real conversation shouldn’t be about “quiet quitting” but about creating sustainable and fulfilling work environments. Employees deserve to have clear boundaries and prioritize their well-being without being labeled as “quitters.” Similarly, employers benefit from a workforce that is engaged, motivated, and not burnt out.