At its core, “quiet quitting” refers to doing the bare minimum at work — fulfilling your job description without going above and beyond. This might look like declining extra projects, leaving work promptly at the end of the day, or disengaging from non-essential work activities.

The term itself is debatable, as it suggests a complete lack of effort or a passive-aggressive approach. However, many argue that “quiet quitting” is simply setting healthy boundaries and prioritizing well-being in a culture obsessed with overwork.

Setting Boundaries vs. Disengagement: Finding the Difference

Understanding “quiet quitting” hinges on differentiating healthy boundary-setting from genuine disengagement.

Healthy Boundaries:

• Prioritizing well-being: Recognizing that work isn’t everything and making time for personal life.
• Saying “no” strategically: Declining additional tasks when you’re already at capacity.
• Focusing on core responsibilities: Completing assigned tasks efficiently without feeling pressured to overextend.

Disengagement:

• Apathy and lack of motivation: Feeling indifferent towards work and making minimal effort.
• Decreased productivity and quality: Allowing work performance to suffer due to lack of interest.
• Negative impact on team morale: Withdrawing from collaboration and contributing to a less positive work environment.

While setting boundaries promotes work-life balance and prevents burnout, disengagement can harm both individual career growth and overall team success.