Enter “quiet quitting,” a term that describes the act of doing the bare minimum at work—no more, no less. It’s about fulfilling your job description without going above and beyond, setting clear limits on your time and energy.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: What’s the Difference?

While the phrase “quiet quitting” might suggest disengagement or apathy, the reality is often more nuanced. Many argue that it’s simply a form of setting healthy boundaries, a way to protect one’s well-being in a demanding work environment.

Here’s a breakdown of the key differences:

• Quiet Quitting: Often perceived negatively, implying a lack of effort and enthusiasm. May involve actively disengaging from work and colleagues.
• Setting Boundaries: Proactive and healthy, focusing on creating a sustainable work-life balance. Involves communicating needs clearly and respectfully.

The key distinction lies in the intention behind the actions. Is it about checking out entirely, or is it about creating a healthier, more sustainable approach to work?

Beyond Quiet Quitting: Why Setting Boundaries Matters

While I understand the concerns surrounding the perceived negativity of “quiet quitting,” I believe this trend has sparked a much-needed conversation. For far too long, hustle culture has glorified overworking and sacrificing personal well-being for the sake of career advancement.

Setting boundaries is not about doing less; it’s about protecting your time and energy so you can bring your best self to work. It’s about recognizing that work is just one aspect of life, not the entirety of it.