The term “quiet quitting” seems to imply a sort of passive resistance, where employees remain in their jobs but mentally “check out,” doing the bare minimum. This can manifest as disengagement, a lack of enthusiasm for new projects, and strict adherence to work hours with no overtime.

Some argue this trend is a direct result of the pandemic and the “Great Resignation,” where employees reevaluated their priorities. Others believe it’s a symptom of a larger issue – widespread burnout and a lack of work-life balance, particularly among younger generations.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: What’s the Difference?

Here’s where the conversation gets interesting. While “quiet quitting” might seem negative on the surface, many are reframing it as something positive: setting boundaries.

Let’s be clear: consistently failing to meet expectations or neglecting responsibilities is not acceptable. However, there’s a difference between that and simply choosing not to go above and beyond the call of duty.

Examples of Healthy Boundary Setting at Work:

• Not responding to work emails or messages outside of working hours.
• Declining to take on additional tasks when already at capacity.
• Prioritizing personal time and commitments over work-related events.

These actions don’t necessarily signify a lack of work ethic or commitment. Instead, they can reflect a desire for a more sustainable and balanced lifestyle.

Creating a Healthy Work Environment: A Two-Way Street

Labeling employees who prioritize their well-being as “quitters” is inaccurate and detrimental. It creates a culture of fear and guilt around setting boundaries, which ultimately benefits no one.