At its core, “quiet quitting” means doing the bare minimum at work—meeting job requirements without going above and beyond. It’s about opting out of hustle culture, declining extra projects, and setting clear boundaries between work and personal life.

This trend emerged post-pandemic as burnout rates soared, and employees reevaluated their priorities. Years of overwork, pressure to be “always on,” and a lack of work-life balance have left many feeling depleted. “Quiet quitting” is a reaction to these systemic issues, a way for employees to reclaim their time and energy.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Unpacking the Nuances

The debate around “quiet quitting” often hinges on semantics. Critics say it’s just a euphemism for disengagement or laziness. However, proponents argue it’s about setting healthy boundaries and prioritizing well-being.

Let’s break down the key arguments:

Is Quiet Quitting Detrimental to Work Culture?

Some believe “quiet quitting” harms company culture and individual career growth. They argue that employees should be fully engaged and contribute their best efforts.

Are Boundaries Essential for Work-Life Balance?

Others see “quiet quitting” as self-preservation and a way to establish a sustainable work-life balance. They argue that employees shouldn’t be expected to go above and beyond their job descriptions without proper compensation or recognition.