Posted in Trending

Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? What the Latest Work Trend Really Means

Author user Estimated read time 3 min read



Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? Decoding the Latest Work Trend

The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“

The term “quiet quitting” has exploded online, sparking debates and countless articles. Everyone from Forbes to The New York Times seems to have an opinion, but what does it really mean? Is this a new phenomenon, or just a trendy name for an age-old struggle?

quiet quitting” emerged in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, as many people re-evaluated their relationship with work. Factors like burnout, lack of work-life balance, and stagnating wages have fueled this trend. At its core, it boils down to employees doing the bare minimum required by their job description, without going above and beyond.

However, this simple definition has drawn criticism for conflating disengagement with healthy boundary-setting. Critics argue that “quiet quitting” is simply a way to shame employees for prioritizing their well-being over hustle culture.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: What’s the Difference?

The truth, as always, lies somewhere in the middle. While some may use “quiet quitting” as an excuse for apathy or laziness, for many, it’s a form of self-preservation. Let’s analyze the key differences:

  • Quiet Quitting: This often involves a passive approach, marked by disengagement, reduced productivity, and a lack of enthusiasm. It can stem from feeling undervalued, burnt out, or simply checked out.
  • Setting Boundaries: This involves actively communicating your limits and needs to your employer. It’s about prioritizing your well-being without sacrificing your job performance. This could mean setting clear work hours, saying no to extra projects, or taking regular breaks.

Related