Furthermore, the traditional “climb the ladder” mentality, often at the expense of personal well-being, is being challenged by younger generations who prioritize work-life balance and personal fulfillment.

Reframing the Narrative: It’s Not Quitting, It’s Setting Boundaries

Here’s where the problem with the term “quiet quitting” arises. It frames the issue as a passive-aggressive form of quitting, implying a lack of work ethic or commitment. However, what’s often being described is simply employees setting healthy boundaries.

Think about it:

• Saying no to working late consistently to make time for personal commitments.
• Not checking emails outside of work hours.
• Focusing on completing assigned tasks effectively within work hours instead of constantly seeking additional responsibilities.

These aren’t signs of “quitting,” they are signs of prioritizing well-being and establishing sustainable work practices. By labeling it “quitting,” we’re perpetuating a culture that glorifies overworking and demonizes setting limits.

Why Setting Boundaries is Essential, Not Entitled

As someone who has experienced burnout firsthand, I firmly believe that setting boundaries is not only acceptable but essential for long-term health and productivity. It’s about recognizing that we are not defined by our jobs and that our worth extends beyond our output.

When we establish clear boundaries, we protect our time and energy, allowing us to show up as our best selves both at work and in our personal lives. This, in turn, leads to greater job satisfaction, improved mental health, and stronger relationships.