The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“: Disengagement or Self-Preservation?
The term “quiet quitting” has taken the internet by storm, sparking countless debates about work-life balance, employee engagement, and the very nature of a job. But is this phenomenon truly about quitting on the sly, or does it point to a deeper shift in how we perceive our relationship with work?
What is “Quiet Quitting” Really? Decoding the Buzzword
At its core, “quiet quitting” refers to the act of doing the bare minimum at work—no more, no less. It’s about fulfilling your job description without going above and beyond, essentially opting out of the hustle culture that often glorifies overworking and constant availability.
Critics argue that it signifies a lack of commitment and a decline in work ethic. They see it as a passive-aggressive approach that breeds resentment and hinders productivity. Proponents, however, view it as a long-overdue recalibration of boundaries, a way to protect one’s well-being in the face of increasing workplace demands.
