Quiet Quitting vs. Quiet Firing: A Silent War in the Workplace?

The Rise of Silent Discontent in the Workplace

The terms “quiet quitting” and “quiet firing” are buzzing around workplaces, pointing to a growing disconnect between employers and employees. This silent battle is fueled by disengagement and subtle tactics on both sides. But what do these terms really mean, and what’s driving this silent war in the modern workplace?

Decoding the Workplace Jargon: Quiet Quitting vs. Quiet Firing

Quiet quitting isn’t about actually quitting your job. It’s about setting boundaries and doing the bare minimum required of you. Think strictly adhering to your job description, no overtime, and a distinct lack of enthusiasm. It’s a silent protest against feeling overworked, undervalued, or simply burnt out.

Quiet firing, on the other hand, is a more passive-aggressive tactic employed by employers. Rather than directly addressing performance issues or letting an employee go, companies create an unpleasant work environment to nudge them towards quitting. This could involve passing them over for promotions, excluding them from important meetings, or assigning them undesirable tasks.

[IMAGE_DESCRIPTION: ...]