Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? What the Latest Workplace Trend Really Means




Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? What the Latest Workplace Trend Really Means


The Rise of “Quiet Quitting”

The term “quiet quitting” has exploded recently, flooding social media feeds and dominating water cooler conversations. Everyone seems to have an opinion on this supposed new workplace phenomenon. But is it truly a new concept, or simply a trendy phrase for something employees have always navigated: setting boundaries?

work. Remote work, flexible schedules, and the “Great Resignation” all contributed to employees re-evaluating their relationship with their jobs. Burnout became rampant, leading many to question the expectation of consistently going above and beyond, especially when employers didn’t reciprocate.

Enter “quiet quitting” – a term often used to describe employees doing the bare minimum at work, fulfilling job descriptions but nothing more. They don’t volunteer for extra projects, work late, or engage in company culture beyond what’s required. While some view this as employees shirking responsibility, others argue it’s a natural consequence of blurred work-life boundaries and a lack of employee appreciation.

Unpacking the Trend: Quiet Quitting vs. Healthy Boundaries

The key to understanding this trend lies in differentiating between its two potential interpretations:

1. Quiet Quitting as Disengagement

In some cases, “quiet quitting” might indeed be a form of disengagement. An employee who feels undervalued, overworked, or simply bored might mentally check out. This can manifest as decreased productivity, reduced quality of work, and a general lack of enthusiasm.

2. Quiet Quitting as Boundary Setting

On the other hand, what some label as “quiet quitting” can also be a healthy response to an unsustainable work environment. Employees, recognizing the importance of their well-being, are establishing clear boundaries between their professional and personal lives. This means prioritizing their time outside of work and refusing to let their jobs consume their entire lives.

The critical difference lies in intention. Is the employee actively disengaging from their work due to dissatisfaction? Or are they consciously choosing to prioritize their well-being by setting healthy boundaries?

My Perspective: Boundaries are Not the Enemy of Productivity

The ability to set boundaries is crucial for a healthy and sustainable work-life balance. Employees shouldn’t be made to feel guilty for having lives outside of work. We are not robots programmed to work endlessly. We are humans with families, hobbies, and a need for rest and rejuvenation.

However, open communication is also vital. If an employee is unhappy with their job or feels unsupported, the answer isn’t necessarily to “quietly quit.” Instead, they should feel empowered to communicate their concerns with their manager or HR. Perhaps there are workload adjustments, skill development opportunities, or even a different role within the company that could reignite their passion.