The term “quiet quitting” gained traction on social media platforms, particularly TikTok, where users shared their experiences of disengaging from the hustle culture mentality. They weren’t necessarily quitting their jobs outright but rather choosing to do the bare minimum required, opting out of extra projects, and prioritizing their well-being over exceeding expectations.

This resonated with many who felt the pressure to constantly go above and beyond, often at the expense of their mental and physical health. The pandemic, with its blurred lines between work and home, further fueled this sentiment.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Healthy Boundaries

Here’s where the waters get murky. Is “quiet quitting” truly a revolutionary act of rebellion against exploitative work practices, or is it simply a rebranding of setting healthy boundaries? The answer, like most things in life, is nuanced.

Let’s break it down:

• Quiet Quitting: This implies a sense of disengagement and apathy. It suggests doing the bare minimum without any real investment in your work or your own growth.
• Setting Boundaries: This involves establishing clear limits to protect your time, energy, and well-being. It’s about communicating your needs and expectations, both to yourself and your employer, to create a sustainable work-life balance.

The crucial difference lies in intention and communication. Quietly withdrawing without addressing underlying issues can be detrimental in the long run, both for your career progression and your overall job satisfaction.