The Great Resignation Evolves: Quiet Quitting and Boundary Setting
The way we work is changing. After the tumultuous years of the pandemic and the subsequent Great Resignation, a new trend is taking root – a silent shift in employee expectations and behaviors. Is it “quiet quitting” – a disengaged, bare-minimum approach? Or is it simply setting healthy boundaries to reclaim personal time and well-being? The lines are blurry, and the answer, as with most things, is nuanced.
Understanding the Landscape: From Hustle Culture to Burnout
For decades, many industries operated under an unspoken rule: “hustle culture.” Long hours, constant availability, and going above and beyond were glorified as markers of ambition and dedication. This relentless pace, however, took its toll. Burnout rates soared, mental health suffered, and the lines between work life and personal life blurred beyond recognition for many.
Decoding the Trends: Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries
The terms “quiet quitting” and “setting boundaries” are often used interchangeably, but they represent distinct approaches to work:
Quiet Quitting:
- Involves doing the bare minimum required for a job without any extra effort or enthusiasm.
- Stems from feeling undervalued, overworked, or disillusioned with the company culture.
- Can manifest as disengagement, decreased productivity, and a decline in work quality.
Setting Boundaries:
- Means clearly defining limits between work and personal life to protect time, well-being, and mental health.
- Involves communicating these limits to employers and colleagues, setting realistic expectations.
- Prioritizes a sustainable workload, allowing for focus and engagement during work hours and true rest and recharge outside of them.