Is ‘Quiet Quitting’ Just Setting Boundaries in Disguise?
The Rise of “Quiet Quitting”: A New Name for an Old Struggle?
Lately, the term “quiet quitting” has exploded across social media and infiltrated water cooler conversations. It seems everyone has an opinion on this phenomenon, with some praising it as a form of self-preservation and others condemning it as a recipe for career stagnation. But what exactly is “quiet quitting,” and is it really as revolutionary as some believe?
From Hustle Culture to Burnout: Understanding the Backstory
To understand “quiet quitting,” we need to acknowledge the context in which it emerged. For years, “hustle culture” reigned supreme. Employees were expected to go above and beyond, blurring the lines between work and personal life. This relentless pursuit of productivity often came at the expense of mental health, leading to widespread burnout.
Enter “quiet quitting” – a seemingly attractive alternative. Instead of grinding themselves down, individuals are choosing to disengage from the pressure-cooker environment. They’re sticking to their job descriptions, clocking out at a reasonable hour, and prioritizing their well-being.
