The modern workplace has undergone significant transformations in recent years. The rise of remote work, the gig economy, and the constant connectivity fueled by technology have blurred the lines between personal and professional lives. Employees are increasingly expected to be “always on,” leading to burnout, stress, and a decline in overall well-being.

It is within this context that “quiet quitting” emerged. The phrase itself can be misleading, as it implies a complete disengagement from work. In reality, many individuals who identify with quiet quitting are simply choosing to do what is outlined in their job descriptions – no more, no less. They are pushing back against the unspoken expectation of going above and beyond, working late nights, and sacrificing their personal lives for the sake of their careers.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Understanding the Difference

The distinction between “quiet quitting” and “setting boundaries” lies in intention and communication.

Quiet Quitting: A Silent Struggle

• Often driven by frustration, burnout, or a lack of motivation.
• Characterized by reduced effort, disengagement, and a decline in work quality.
• Typically not communicated directly to employers, leading to confusion and potential misunderstandings.

Setting Boundaries: A Proactive Approach

• A proactive approach to prioritize well-being and establish a sustainable work-life balance.
• Involves clear communication with employers about work hours, availability, and expectations.
• Aims to create a mutually respectful and productive work environment.