Coined in early 2022, “quiet quitting” describes the act of doing the bare minimum at work. No more going above and beyond, no more burning the midnight oil – just fulfilling your job description and clocking out.

This trend emerged in the wake of the Great Resignation, where record numbers of employees left their jobs, seeking better work-life balance and fulfillment. Quiet quitting, some argue, is a less drastic response to the same underlying issues: burnout, lack of appreciation, and feeling undervalued.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Healthy Boundaries at Work

Here’s where the debate heats up. Is quiet quitting simply a rebranding of setting healthy boundaries, or is it a slippery slope towards disengagement and decreased productivity?

Arguments for ‘Quiet Quitting’ as Healthy Boundaries:

• Prioritizing well-being: In a culture that often glorifies overwork, setting limits on work hours and mental energy can be crucial for mental and physical health.
• Redefining success: Quiet quitting challenges the notion that our self-worth is solely tied to our professional achievements, encouraging a more holistic view of success.
• Promoting work-life balance: By drawing a clear line between work and personal life, individuals can reclaim their time and energy for passions and relationships outside the office.

Arguments Against ‘Quiet Quitting’ in the Workplace:

• Impact on career progression: Going above and beyond is often expected for promotions and raises. Quiet quitting might hinder career growth opportunities.
• Potential for resentment: If only some team members embrace quiet quitting, it can create an imbalance and breed resentment among colleagues carrying a heavier workload.
• Miscommunication and missed opportunities: A lack of open communication about boundaries can be misinterpreted as disinterest, leading to missed opportunities for growth and collaboration.