Is ‘Quiet Quitting’ Just Setting Boundaries? The Big Debate Explored



The Rise of “Quiet Quitting

Quiet quitting” – the phrase has exploded across social media and sparked countless debates. Is it the latest workplace trend signaling a generation rejecting hustle culture? Or is it a thinly veiled attempt to rebrand basic professionalism? Whatever your stance, there’s no denying this phenomenon has ignited a conversation about work-life balance, employee expectations, and the very nature of a job.

Decoding the Buzzword

At its core, “quiet quitting” refers to the act of doing the bare minimum at work. No going above and beyond, no burning the midnight oil – just fulfilling your job description and clocking out mentally (if not physically) at the end of the day.

Proponents argue that it’s about setting healthy boundaries, prioritizing well-being, and pushing back against unrealistic workloads. Critics, however, view it as a recipe for career stagnation, a lack of commitment, and ultimately, a disservice to both the individual and the employer.

A group of people having a conversation in a relaxed office setting.