The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“
The term “quiet quitting” has recently taken social media and workplace conversations by storm. But what does it really mean? Is it a wave of disengaged employees leaving their jobs, or is there more to the story?
This questioning coincided with the rise of “hustle culture” – the relentless pursuit of productivity, often at the expense of personal time and mental health. For many, “quiet quitting” became synonymous with rejecting this unsustainable model.
Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: What’s the Difference?
This is where the lines become blurred. The term “quiet quitting” itself can be misleading. It implies a passive form of protest, a silent withdrawal from work. However, many argue that it’s simply a new term for a crucial concept: setting boundaries.
Let’s break down the difference:
- Quiet Quitting: Often involves doing the bare minimum at work, resisting extra responsibilities, and mentally checking out. While it might seem like a solution, it can lead to disengagement and potentially hinder career growth.
- Setting Boundaries: A proactive approach that involves clearly defining limits between work life and personal life. It means prioritizing well-being, declining additional work when necessary, and focusing on completing assigned tasks within work hours.