The concept of “quiet quitting” emerged in the wake of the Great Resignation, a period marked by unprecedented numbers of employees leaving their jobs. This mass exodus highlighted the growing dissatisfaction and burnout many experienced due to increased workloads, lack of support, and stagnant wages. “Quiet quitting” reflects a growing desire among employees to establish healthier boundaries between their work and personal lives. It’s about fulfilling your job responsibilities without subscribing to the “hustle culture” that often leads to burnout.

Unpacking the Trend: Disengagement vs. Healthy Detachment

Understanding “quiet quitting” requires distinguishing between two distinct approaches:

1. Passive Disengagement: The Signs of a Disengaged Employee

This involves a genuine lack of motivation and effort. Employees might be mentally “checked out,” doing the bare minimum to get by. They may be actively seeking other opportunities or simply lack the energy to invest in their current role.

2. Strategic Boundary-Setting: Prioritizing Well-being at Work

This approach is about making conscious choices. Employees are engaged in their work but prioritize their well-being by setting clear boundaries. They might choose not to engage in extra work outside of their defined hours, politely decline tasks outside their job description, or prioritize personal time over attending every work social event.

While passive disengagement signals a potentially unhealthy work environment and potential employee turnover, strategic boundary-setting is a positive step towards a more sustainable and fulfilling work experience.