Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? What the Latest Workplace Trend Really Means



The Rise of “Quiet Quitting

The term “quiet quitting” has taken the internet by storm, sparking countless articles, social media debates, and even think pieces on the state of work-life balance. But what does it actually mean? Is it a silent protest against hustle culture or simply a rebranding of setting boundaries?

Unpacking the Quiet Quitting Trend

The phrase itself is a bit of a misnomer. “Quiet quitting” doesn’t involve actually quitting your job. Instead, it refers to the act of doing the bare minimum at work, no longer going above and beyond, and strictly adhering to your job description. Think of it as a withdrawal of enthusiasm rather than a full-blown resignation.

Several factors have contributed to this trend:

  • Burnout: The pandemic, coupled with economic uncertainty, has left many feeling overworked and emotionally drained.
  • The Great Resignation: Witnessing colleagues leave for greener pastures has prompted some to re-evaluate their own priorities.
  • Shifting Values: Younger generations are increasingly prioritizing work-life balance and seeking fulfillment outside of their careers.

Setting Boundaries vs. Quiet Quitting: What’s the Difference?

The crucial distinction to make is whether “quiet quitting” is a healthy way to establish boundaries or a passive-aggressive form of disengagement.

Setting Healthy Boundaries at Work

There’s nothing inherently wrong with setting boundaries. In fact, it’s essential for a sustainable work-life balance. This includes:

  1. Defining your limits: Clearly communicate your availability and what falls outside your job scope.
  2. Prioritizing your well-being: Don’t sacrifice your personal life for work. Take breaks, utilize vacation time, and prioritize self-care.
  3. Focusing on your responsibilities: Complete your assigned tasks efficiently but avoid taking on unnecessary work.
Photo of a person slumped over their desk, looking bored and disengaged.