Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? Why the Latest Work Trend Sparks Debate



The Silent Shift: Is It “Quiet Quitting” or Something Else?

The term “quiet quitting” is everywhere these days. But what does it really mean? Is it about doing the bare minimum, a silent protest against hustle culture, or simply setting healthy boundaries? The answer is complex and has sparked a debate about work-life balance, employee expectations, and the very nature of work in today’s world.

Unpacking the Buzzword: Origins and Interpretations of Quiet Quitting

The phrase “quiet quitting” gained traction on social media, reflecting a growing sentiment among employees, particularly millennials and Gen Z. Many feel overworked and undervalued, leading to burnout and disillusionment. Quiet quitting, in this context, is seen as a way to reclaim personal time and mental energy without the upheaval of actually quitting a job.

However, this definition has sparked controversy. Critics argue that “quiet quitting” is simply a rebranding of doing the bare minimum – a behavior that’s always existed but is now being romanticized. They worry that it encourages a lack of commitment and ambition, ultimately harming both employees and employers.

An illustration of a scale balancing work and life.