The Rise of “Quiet Quitting”: A New Name for an Old Struggle?
The term “quiet quitting” has taken the internet by storm, sparking countless debates and articles. But is it truly a new phenomenon, or have we simply slapped a trendy label on an age-old workplace dilemma? This seemingly simple phrase has ignited a conversation about work-life balance, employee expectations, and the very nature of a fulfilling career.
Unpacking the Buzzword: What Does “Quiet Quitting” Really Mean?
At its core, “quiet quitting” refers to the act of doing the bare minimum at work. Employees who are “quiet quitting” are not going above and beyond, they’re fulfilling their job description and nothing more. They’re not actively seeking promotions, attending extra meetings, or taking on additional responsibilities outside their defined roles.
However, the ambiguity of the term is where the real debate lies. Some argue that it’s simply a rebranding of disengagement and a lack of work ethic. Others, however, view it as a form of self-preservation – a way to establish healthy boundaries and prioritize well-being in a demanding work culture.
