The Rise of ‘Quiet Quitting‘: A New Term for an Old Struggle?
The internet is buzzing with talk of “quiet quitting,” a seemingly new phenomenon sparking countless articles, social media debates, and anxiety among employers. But is “quiet quitting” truly a new trend, or just a trendy new term for something many employees have been doing for years?
“Quiet quitting” emerged as a way to describe employees who, instead of outright quitting, are mentally “checking out.” They’re doing the bare minimum, setting stricter boundaries, and rejecting the “above and beyond” mentality.
Quiet Quitting or Healthy Boundaries?
The debate around “quiet quitting” hinges on whether it’s negative or positive. Some argue it’s detrimental, decreasing productivity and company loyalty. Others see it as a correction to unsustainable work expectations.
Arguments Against “Quiet Quitting”:
- Can create resentment among colleagues going the extra mile.
- May lead to decreased work quality and innovation.
- Could hinder career progression for those not actively engaged.
Arguments for “Quiet Quitting” (or Boundary-Setting):
- Helps prevent burnout and improve mental health.
- Allows employees to prioritize their personal lives and well-being.
- Forces employers to re-evaluate workloads and expectations.