The Quiet Sibling of The Great Resignation
Is it a silent protest or a healthy shift in priorities? “Quiet quitting” has become a buzzword, capturing the sentiment of today’s workforce and sparking debates about work-life balance, employee expectations, and the changing nature of work. But is this phenomenon truly about quitting discreetly, or are we witnessing a necessary recalibration of boundaries?
However, not everyone can afford to quit their jobs. Enter “quiet quitting,” a trend where employees stay employed but mentally disengage. They do the bare minimum, resist going above and beyond, and prioritize their personal time over work commitments.
Unpacking the Nuances: Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries
While “quiet quitting” might sound appealing to some, it’s crucial to differentiate it from setting healthy boundaries. Here’s a closer look:
Quiet Quitting:
- Often stems from resentment, disillusionment, or burnout.
- Characterized by disengagement, apathy, and doing the bare minimum.
- Can negatively impact team morale and productivity.
- May lead to a sense of stagnation and hinder career growth.
Setting Boundaries:
- Proactive approach to managing workload and expectations.
- Involves clear communication with supervisors and colleagues about limits.
- Prioritizes well-being and prevents burnout.
- Allows for sustainable engagement and productivity.