The rise of “quiet quitting” can be linked to several factors, including the COVID-19 pandemic, which forced many to re-evaluate their priorities. Burnout and work-life balance became major concerns as remote work blurred the lines between professional and personal lives.

Importantly, “quiet quitting” doesn’t always mean quitting your job outright. It often looks like this:

• Reduced Engagement: Meeting only the minimum job requirements without going the extra mile.
• Strict Work-Life Boundaries: Not checking emails or answering work calls outside of designated work hours.
• Prioritizing Personal Time: Declining additional projects or commitments that infringe on personal time.

Quiet Quitting or Setting Healthy Boundaries? Unpacking the Debate

Here’s where opinions clash. Critics view “quiet quitting” as disengagement that harms company culture, seeing it as passive-aggressive dissatisfaction. Conversely, proponents argue it’s about setting healthy boundaries and reclaiming personal time.

The truth likely lies somewhere in between. While some might use “quiet quitting” as a form of protest, others are simply prioritizing their well-being. It’s vital to consider individual motivations and the broader work environment.