The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“
The term “quiet quitting” has taken social media and workplaces by storm, sparking debates about its true meaning. Is it a form of self-preservation in demanding work environments, or does it signify a lack of career ambition?
This is where “quiet quitting” comes in—a term some argue is misleading. It’s not about actually quitting your job but rather a shift in mindset. Instead of going above and beyond, individuals are setting boundaries, fulfilling their job requirements without subscribing to the “hustle culture” of overwork.
Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: What’s the Difference?
The key difference lies in the intention. Let’s break it down:
Quiet Quitting:
- Disengagement: Characterized by apathy or a sense of detachment from work.
- Minimal Effort: Doing the bare minimum required for the role.
- Lack of Initiative: Avoiding taking on new responsibilities or challenges.
Setting Boundaries:
- Prioritization: Establishing clear boundaries between work hours and personal time.
- Sustainable Pace: Focusing on delivering quality work within a reasonable timeframe.
- Open Communication: Communicating needs and expectations clearly with managers and colleagues.
While “quiet quitting” can be seen as a passive form of resistance, setting boundaries is about actively creating a healthier and more sustainable work-life balance.