The term “quiet quitting” itself is somewhat misleading. It doesn’t actually involve quitting your job but rather adopting a more passive approach to work. This might look like:

• Sticking strictly to job descriptions and not taking on extra tasks.
• Disengaging from non-essential work activities like after-hours meetings or social events.
• Prioritizing personal time and well-being over going above and beyond.

While some see this as a worrying trend signaling a lack of commitment, others argue it’s a natural response to demanding work cultures and a necessary step towards establishing healthier boundaries.

Why the Rise of “Quiet Quitting”? Understanding the Root Causes

To understand the rise of “quiet quitting,” we need to look at the broader context:

1. Burnout Culture: The pandemic exacerbated an already prevalent issue of burnout, with employees feeling pressured to do more with less.
2. The Rise of Remote Work: While offering flexibility, remote work has also blurred the lines between professional and personal lives, making it harder to switch off.
3. Shifting Priorities: Younger generations are increasingly prioritizing well-being and seeking purpose in their work, leading them to question traditional notions of career success.

“Quiet quitting” could be seen as a symptom of these larger issues – a cry for help from employees feeling overwhelmed and undervalued.

My Perspective: It’s About Setting Healthy Boundaries, Not Checking Out of Work

I believe the conversation around “quiet quitting” often misses the mark. Framing it as simply a lack of engagement ignores the underlying reasons behind this shift in employee behavior. For many, “quiet quitting” is less about apathy and more about setting healthy boundaries.

We are not machines. We cannot be “on” all the time. Employees who set boundaries are not being disloyal; they are prioritizing their well-being and ensuring they can bring their best selves to work.