Enter “quiet quitting,” a term that, despite its name, isn’t actually about quitting at all. Instead, it signifies a shift in mindset. Employees are pushing back against the expectation of constant overperformance. They are choosing to:

• Set boundaries: No more checking emails after hours or working through lunch breaks.
• Prioritize personal life: Family, hobbies, and mental health are taking precedence.
• Focus on contracted duties: Employees are fulfilling their job descriptions, but not necessarily going the extra mile.

Disengagement or Self-Preservation? Analyzing the Debate

The debate surrounding “quiet quitting” hinges on its interpretation. Some view it negatively, equating it to disengagement and a lack of ambition. They argue that it fosters a culture of mediocrity and stifles innovation. Others, however, see it as a necessary act of self-preservation. They argue that employees are simply reclaiming their time and setting healthy boundaries in response to unsustainable work demands.

The truth, as with most things, likely lies somewhere in the middle. There’s a difference between disengagement and strategic prioritization. An employee who is checked out and delivering subpar work is a cause for concern. However, an employee who is simply choosing to focus their energy within work hours and prioritize their well-being is practicing self-care and potentially preventing burnout.