Quiet quitting, in its essence, isn’t about actually quitting your job. Instead, it’s about “quitting” the hustle culture mentality of constantly going above and beyond. It’s about setting clear boundaries between your professional and personal life, and refusing to let work consume every waking moment. Think: leaving work promptly at the end of your workday, not checking emails after hours, and prioritizing your well-being over climbing the corporate ladder at all costs.

This trend has emerged in the wake of the pandemic, which forced many to re-evaluate their priorities and the role of work in their lives. The rise of remote work further blurred the lines between personal and professional time, contributing to burnout and a desire for greater autonomy.

Quiet Quitting vs. Healthy Boundaries: What’s the Difference?

The debate surrounding “quiet quitting” hinges on whether it’s a legitimate response to unreasonable work demands or a sign of disengagement and a lack of work ethic. Some argue that it’s simply a rebranding of what was once considered a healthy approach to work-life balance.

Here’s a breakdown of the arguments:

• Quiet Quitting as Boundary-Setting: Proponents argue that it’s about reclaiming personal time and setting healthy boundaries in an increasingly demanding work environment. It’s about prioritizing well-being and refusing to be defined solely by one’s job.
• Quiet Quitting as Disengagement: Critics argue that it’s a form of passive resistance that can damage team morale and productivity. They claim it reflects a lack of commitment and can ultimately hinder career progression.