The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“: Disengagement or Self-Preservation?
The workplace is buzzing with talk of “quiet quitting,” a term that has sparked debate and introspection about the modern work landscape. Is it a concerning sign of growing employee disengagement or a long-overdue recalibration of work-life boundaries? This article aims to unpack the phenomenon of “quiet quitting,” exploring its potential causes and consequences while examining whether it’s truly a new concept or simply a rebranding of an age-old struggle.
From Hustle Culture to Boundary Setting: A Workplace Shift
The past decade has witnessed the rise and, arguably, the fall of “hustle culture” – a mentality that glorifies overworking and prioritizes professional achievement above all else. Burnout, anxiety, and a lack of work-life balance have become unfortunate hallmarks of this relentless pursuit of success.
Enter “quiet quitting.” This term, popularized on social media, describes the act of fulfilling one’s job duties without going above and beyond. It’s about rejecting the pressure to overwork and instead choosing to prioritize personal time and well-being.
