Introduction: The Rise of ‘Quiet Quitting’
The term “quiet quitting” has exploded online, igniting debates and think pieces. It describes employees doing the bare minimum, meeting job requirements without going above and beyond. The phrase may be new, but the underlying feeling of disengagement and apathy toward work is not. This begs the question: Is “quiet quitting” truly a new trend, or are we simply giving a fresh name to an age-old workplace issue?
A Historical Perspective: The Evolution of Work and Apathy
To understand the potential historical roots of “quiet quitting,” we need to consider how work itself has evolved. For centuries, work was often tied to survival – farming, craftsmanship, and trade were essential for sustenance. The Industrial Revolution brought about a shift towards factory work, characterized by repetitive tasks and strict hierarchies.
The 20th century witnessed the rise of the “white-collar” worker and the concept of the “career ladder.” Employees were encouraged to strive for upward mobility, often putting in long hours and making personal sacrifices in pursuit of professional success.