Is ‘Quiet Quitting’ Really Quiet Quitting, or Just Setting Boundaries?
The Rise of ‘Quiet Quitting’
The workplace is abuzz with talk of “quiet quitting.” This newly coined term has sparked debate, leaving some applauding its empowering message while others criticize it as detrimental to company culture. But what exactly is quiet quitting, and is it really the subversive act some claim it to be?
Defining the Gray Area: Disengagement or Self-Preservation?
Quiet quitting, at its core, is about doing the bare minimum at work. No more going above and beyond, no late nights, and a firm “no” to extra projects that fall outside the agreed-upon job description. While this might sound like a recipe for disaster to some, proponents argue it’s simply about setting healthy boundaries and achieving a better work-life balance.
The term itself can be misleading, as it implies a complete disengagement from one’s job. However, many “quiet quitters” aren’t actually quitting at all. They’re still showing up, completing their assigned tasks, and contributing to the team – just without the added pressure of constantly going the extra mile.
