The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“: A Sign of the Times?
The term “quiet quitting” has taken the internet by storm, sparking heated debates and think pieces galore. It seems everyone has an opinion on this seemingly new phenomenon in the workplace. But is it really a new concept, or simply a trendy term for something many of us have experienced or witnessed before?
From Hustle Culture to Boundary Setting: A Shift in Perspective
The past decade saw the rise and reign of “hustle culture,” where employees were expected (and often celebrated) for going above and beyond, often at the expense of their well-being. Long hours, constant availability, and a “work comes first” mentality became the norm. However, the pandemic forced a collective reevaluation of priorities. Burnout rates soared, and many began questioning the sustainability of this always-on lifestyle.
Enter “quiet quitting” – a term that encapsulates the rejection of hustle culture’s demands. It’s about doing your assigned tasks, and no more. It’s about reclaiming personal time and prioritizing mental health over climbing the corporate ladder at all costs.
Quiet Quitting or Healthy Detachment? Unpacking the Nuances
While the term itself might suggest a passive-aggressive approach to work, the reality is more complex. “Quiet quitting” can manifest in different ways:
- Setting Clear Boundaries: This involves declining extra work that falls outside agreed-upon hours or job descriptions. It’s about prioritizing personal time and commitments.
