Introduction: The Rise of “Quiet Quitting”
The term “quiet quitting” is creating a buzz in workplaces, sparking debates about work-life balance, employee expectations, and career satisfaction. But is this really a new phenomenon? Or is it simply a new name for the age-old struggle to set boundaries between our work and personal lives?
Understanding the “Quiet Quitting” Trend
In essence, “quiet quitting” means fulfilling your job requirements without going above and beyond. It’s about clocking in and clocking out, establishing a clear separation between work duties and personal time. Those who support this approach see it as self-preservation, a way to avoid burnout in a culture that often glorifies overworking. Critics, however, view it as a passive-aggressive way of expressing dissatisfaction, a gradual disengagement that ultimately harms both the individual and the company.
This trend is emerging alongside evolving employee expectations, particularly among younger generations. The pandemic, which blurred the lines between work and home, further fueled the desire for greater work-life balance and flexibility. Employees are increasingly seeking purpose and meaning in their work and are less willing to sacrifice their well-being for a job that doesn’t align with their values.
