The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“: A New Term for an Old Problem?
The term “quiet quitting” has exploded online, igniting discussions about work-life balance, employee engagement, and the very definition of a job. But is this truly a new phenomenon, or are we just assigning a trendy phrase to something many workers have experienced for years?
Social media, especially TikTok, has provided a platform for workers to share their experiences and frustrations, leading to the viral spread of the term. This widespread discussion has forced employers and society to confront crucial questions about employee expectations and workplace culture.
Decoding “Quiet Quitting”: Disengagement or Healthy Boundaries?
At its core, “quiet quitting” describes employees doing the bare minimum required for their jobs, without going above and beyond. However, this simple definition masks a more complex reality. It’s vital to differentiate between two groups often lumped together under this umbrella:
- The Truly Disengaged: These individuals have mentally checked out. They lack motivation, feel indifferent about their work, and are simply going through the motions. This can stem from factors like poor management, lack of growth opportunities, or feeling unappreciated.
- The Boundary Setters: This group isn’t necessarily disengaged from their work. Instead, they are actively choosing to prioritize their well-being by setting firm boundaries between their professional and personal lives. They meet their job requirements but are unwilling to sacrifice their personal time or mental health for the sake of exceeding expectations.