The Rise of “Quiet Quitting”: A New Name for an Old Struggle?
Lately, the term “quiet quitting” has exploded across social media and infiltrated water-cooler conversations around the globe. It seems everyone has an opinion on this seemingly new approach to work-life balance, where employees do the bare minimum required of them and resist the urge to go above and beyond. But is “quiet quitting” really a novel concept, or is it merely a catchy rebranding of something employees have grappled with for decades?
Understanding the Roots of Quiet Quitting
The rise of “quiet quitting” can be attributed to various factors. The COVID-19 pandemic forced many to re-evaluate their priorities, with burnout and work-life balance taking center stage. The transition to remote work further blurred the lines between personal and professional lives, leaving some feeling perpetually “on” and craving clear boundaries.
Moreover, a generation that prioritizes personal fulfillment over corporate ladders is questioning the traditional definition of success. They’re less inclined to subscribe to the “hustle culture” mentality and are more likely to prioritize their well-being, even if it means not climbing the corporate ladder at lightning speed.
