Is It Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? What This Work Trend Really Means
The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“
The term “quiet quitting” has taken the internet by storm, sparking countless debates and think pieces. It seems everyone, from employees to CEOs, has an opinion on this new phenomenon sweeping the workplace. But is it really new, or are we just putting a trendy label on an age-old struggle: the quest for work-life balance?
Understanding the Roots of Quiet Quitting
The pandemic undoubtedly shifted our relationship with work. Remote work blurred the lines between personal and professional lives, often leaving employees feeling burnt out and taken advantage of. In this context, “quiet quitting” emerged as a form of silent protest, a way for employees to reclaim their time and energy.
Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Decoding the Trend
The problem with the term “quiet quitting” is its ambiguity. For some, it simply means doing the bare minimum required for their job description – no more, no less. For others, it’s about strategically opting out of tasks or projects that contribute to burnout without adequate recognition or compensation.
However, framing this trend solely as “quitting,” even quietly, misses a crucial point: setting boundaries.
