Is ‘Quiet Quitting’ Really Just Setting Boundaries? Exploring the Latest Workplace Trend





The Rise of Quiet Quitting

The term “quiet quitting” has exploded across social media and infiltrated every corner of the working world. It’s the hot topic at the (virtual) water cooler, sparking debates and generating countless think pieces. But what exactly does it mean? Is it a revolutionary act of self-preservation or a recipe for career stagnation?

Decoding the Quiet Quitting Buzzword

In essence, “quiet quitting” refers to the act of doing the bare minimum at work. It’s about fulfilling your job description—no more, no less. Gone are the days of going above and beyond, chasing promotions, and burning the midnight oil. Quiet quitters prioritize their personal lives and well-being, clocking out mentally (and sometimes physically) at the end of their workday.

This phenomenon emerged in the wake of the Great Resignation, a period marked by unprecedented numbers of employees leaving their jobs. Many see “quiet quitting” as a less drastic alternative to quitting altogether—a way to reclaim a sense of control and balance without completely jumping ship.

Setting Boundaries or Checking Out: The Great Quiet Quitting Debate

The conversation surrounding “quiet quitting” is riddled with nuance and often fueled by passionate opinions. Is it simply a matter of setting healthy boundaries, or is it a passive form of disengagement that ultimately harms everyone involved?

Arguments for Quiet Quitting as Boundary Setting: