Is ‘Quiet Quitting’ Just Setting Boundaries in Disguise?



The Rise of ‘Quiet Quitting’: A New Name for an Old Struggle?

The internet is buzzing with talk of “quiet quitting,” a term that has sparked a wave of think pieces, social media debates, and even some soul-searching among employees and employers alike. But is this really a new phenomenon, or are we simply putting a trendy label on something that’s been simmering beneath the surface of workplace dynamics for years?

Decoding the Buzzword: What is ‘Quiet Quitting’?

At its core, “quiet quitting” refers to the act of doing the bare minimum at work. It’s about fulfilling your job description without going above and beyond, opting out of the hustle culture that often glorifies overworking and prioritizing a healthier work-life balance.

Proponents of the trend argue that it’s about reclaiming personal time and setting healthy boundaries in a work environment that often demands more than what’s sustainable. Critics, however, view it as a passive-aggressive form of disengagement that could ultimately harm one’s career prospects.

A person working at a desk with a laptop, smiling and looking relaxed