Is ‘Quiet Quitting’ Just Setting Boundaries in Disguise?




Is ‘Quiet Quitting’ Just Setting Boundaries in Disguise?


The Rise of ‘Quiet Quitting‘: Disengagement or Healthy Detachment?

The term “quiet quitting” has taken the internet by storm, sparking heated debates about work-life balance, employee expectations, and the very nature of a job. Is it a concerning trend signifying a generation of disengaged workers, or is it simply a long-overdue recalibration of boundaries in the modern workplace?

Understanding the Phenomenon: Where Did ‘Quiet Quitting‘ Come From?

The phrase itself is somewhat misleading, as “quiet quitting” doesn’t actually involve quitting your job at all. Instead, it refers to the act of doing the bare minimum required of you at work, no more, no less. You clock in and out on time, fulfill your assigned tasks, but refrain from going above and beyond or engaging in extra activities like working late or attending optional meetings.

This trend has gained traction in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which forced many to re-evaluate their priorities and relationship with work. Factors like burnout, lack of recognition, and stagnant wages have contributed to a growing sentiment of disillusionment among employees, leading some to mentally “check out” while remaining physically employed.

Two people shaking hands, symbolizing a positive employer-employee relationship