To understand this trend, we need to acknowledge the context in which it emerged. The pandemic, with its blurring of work-life boundaries and increased workloads, forced many to re-evaluate their relationship with work. Burnout became rampant, and the traditional notion of going “above and beyond” was questioned as employees grappled with unprecedented stress levels and diminishing returns for their extra efforts.

Simultaneously, social media platforms gave rise to a new wave of career advice, emphasizing work-life balance and personal well-being. Influencers encouraged setting boundaries, prioritizing mental health, and rejecting the “hustle culture” that often leads to burnout.

Quiet Quitting or Healthy Detachment?

The core of “quiet quitting” lies in doing exactly what your job description requires—no more, no less. It’s about rejecting the pressure to consistently over-perform, work late, or take on extra tasks without proper compensation or recognition.

Here’s where the debate gets interesting. Some argue that this is a recipe for mediocrity, disengagement, and ultimately, a decline in company performance. They view it as a lack of commitment and a threat to a company’s success.

However, others argue that “quiet quitting” is simply a way of setting healthy boundaries. It’s about protecting your time and energy, avoiding burnout, and prioritizing your well-being. Proponents of this view argue that it’s not about doing less, but rather about working smarter and focusing on what truly matters—both in one’s professional and personal life.