The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“: A New Term for an Old Problem?
The term “quiet quitting” has exploded across the internet, igniting discussions on social media and news platforms. It describes the act of doing the bare minimum at work, fulfilling your responsibilities without going above and beyond. No more late nights, no more extra projects, and a firm departure from the “hustle culture” mentality. But is this really a new phenomenon, or just a new name for an old struggle?
Burnout and Boundaries: Understanding the Context of “Quiet Quitting“
To understand “quiet quitting,” we need to look at the environment that birthed it. The COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed our relationship with work. Remote work blurred the lines between our personal and professional lives, often leading to longer hours and increased burnout. Simultaneously, the pandemic spurred a collective reflection on values and priorities. Work-life balance became paramount, with employees demanding more from employers – flexibility, empathy, and respect for their time.
“Quiet quitting” emerged in this context as a silent protest against unsustainable work practices. It’s a way for employees, especially millennials and Gen Z, to reclaim their time and mental energy. Instead of outright quitting their jobs, they’re “quietly quitting” the expectation of overworking, choosing to prioritize their well-being.
