To understand this phenomenon, we need to consider the backdrop against which it’s emerged. The COVID-19 pandemic blurred the lines between work and personal life for many, leading to burnout and a reevaluation of priorities. Simultaneously, movements like “The Great Resignation” and discussions around hustle culture have prompted individuals to question traditional work expectations.

In this context, “quiet quitting” can be seen as a response to several factors:

• Burnout and Exhaustion: After years of overwork and pandemic-induced stress, many individuals are simply depleted and seeking a more sustainable pace.
• Shifting Values: Younger generations, in particular, are prioritizing well-being and personal fulfillment, seeking more than just a paycheck from their careers.
• Lack of Boundaries: The always-on nature of technology and remote work has made it challenging for some to disconnect, leading to a desire for firmer boundaries.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: What’s the Difference?

The key to understanding “quiet quitting” lies in differentiating between true disengagement and healthy boundary-setting.

Quiet Quitting Signs:

• Involves doing the bare minimum at work with little to no enthusiasm.
• Stems from feelings of resentment, apathy, or disillusionment with one’s job.
• Can be detrimental to both the individual and the organization in the long run.

Setting Boundaries at Work:

• Means establishing clear limits between work and personal life to protect one’s well-being.
• Comes from a place of self-awareness and a desire for a more balanced lifestyle.
• Can be beneficial for both the individual and the organization by fostering sustainability and preventing burnout.