Is Quiet Quitting Just Setting Boundaries at Work?



The Rise of Quiet Quitting

The term “quiet quitting” has exploded across social media, sparking heated debates about work-life balance, employee engagement, and the very definition of a “good” employee. But is this really a new phenomenon, or just a new name for an age-old struggle?

Understanding the Quiet Quitting Trend

At its core, quiet quitting refers to the act of doing the bare minimum at work. Employees who engage in quiet quitting are no longer going above and beyond, working late, or taking on extra tasks outside their job description. They are, essentially, setting clear boundaries between their professional and personal lives.

Several factors have contributed to the rise of this trend:

  • Burnout Culture: Years of hustle culture and pressure to constantly over-perform have left many feeling burnt out and disillusioned.
  • The Great Resignation: The pandemic triggered a wave of resignations as people reevaluated their priorities, leading to increased workloads and pressure on those who remained.
  • Shifting Values: Younger generations entering the workforce are prioritizing well-being and personal fulfillment over traditional notions of career success.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: What’s the Difference?

The debate hinges on whether quiet quitting is simply a negative rebranding of healthy boundary-setting or a symptom of a larger problem.

The Case for Healthy Boundaries at Work

Advocates argue that “quiet quitting” is just a way for employees to reclaim their personal time and prevent burnout. They argue that setting boundaries is crucial for maintaining a healthy work-life balance, preventing resentment, and ultimately improving productivity in the long run.