Just Relaxed Blog

Tag: Employee Wellbeing

Is It Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? Decoding the Latest Work Trend
The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“: A New Name for an Old Struggle?

Lately, the term “quiet quitting” has taken the internet by storm, sparking debates and think pieces across social media and workplaces alike. But is this really a new phenomenon, or have we simply slapped a trendy label on an age-old struggle – the desire for a healthier work-life balance?
Quiet Quitting
The COVID-19 pandemic undeniably shifted our relationship with work. Remote work blurred the lines between personal and professional life, leading to longer hours and increased burnout for many. This, coupled with the “Great Resignation” where employees re-evaluated their priorities, set the stage for “quiet quitting.”

But the trend also speaks to deeper issues:
- Hustle Culture: The glorification of overwork and the pressure to constantly go above and beyond has left many feeling burnt out and undervalued.
- Lack of Boundaries: Technology has made us constantly accessible, making it harder to disconnect from work and truly recharge.
- Shifting Values: Younger generations are increasingly prioritizing personal fulfillment and well-being, seeking more than just a paycheck from their jobs.
Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: What’s the Difference?

The ambiguity of “quiet quitting” is where the real debate lies. To some, it signifies a concerning lack of engagement and commitment. Employees labeled as “quiet quitters” are perceived as doing the bare minimum, disengaged, and potentially harming team morale.

However, others argue that “quiet quitting” is just a buzzword for setting healthy boundaries. It’s about prioritizing your well-being, refusing to overwork, and establishing clear limits between your personal and professional life. This perspective emphasizes work-life balance and challenges the expectation of constant availability.

March 11, 2025
Quiet Quitting is Out, Quiet Thriving is In: How to Find Fulfillment at Work

The Shift from Silent Discontent to Quiet Fulfillment

Remember “quiet quitting”? The internet’s favorite buzzword briefly captured the growing feeling of employee disillusionment. But the narrative is changing. Enter “quiet thriving” – a proactive approach to reclaiming your work experience and finding joy, even without a complete career change.

Decoding the “Quiet” Trends in the Workplace

The “quiet” in both trends speaks volumes. It reflects a reality where openly addressing dissatisfaction can feel risky. Employees, especially younger generations, seek agency without rocking the boat.

Quiet quitting was about setting boundaries – doing the bare minimum and emotionally checking out. It was a survival tactic in response to feeling overworked and undervalued.

Quiet thriving is about actively seeking fulfillment within the existing structure. It’s about identifying what brings joy at work and maximizing those elements while maintaining clear boundaries.

March 11, 2025
Is ‘Quiet Quitting’ Really the Answer? Exploring Healthy Work Boundaries in 2023
Quitting’ Really the Answer? Exploring Healthy Work Boundaries in 2023

The whisper network of the internet has spoken, and the latest buzzword echoing through the virtual halls is ‘Quiet Quitting‘. But what does it really mean? Is it a mass exodus of disengaged employees, or a silent revolution in setting healthy work boundaries? The answer, like most things in life, is nuanced and complex.

The Rise of Quiet Quitting: Symptom or Solution?

Born from pandemic burnout and a reassessment of priorities, ‘Quiet Quitting‘ isn’t about literally quitting your job. Instead, it’s about opting out of the hustle culture that demands we go above and beyond at the expense of our well-being. Think: setting boundaries, working your contracted hours, and leaving the office stress (and emails!) behind at the end of the day.

Quiet Quitting in 2023: Analyzing the Trend

Like any cultural phenomenon, ‘Quiet Quitting’ has sparked debate.

Pros of Setting Boundaries at Work:
- Prioritizing well-being: By setting boundaries, individuals prioritize their mental and physical health, leading to potentially reduced stress and burnout.
- Reclaiming personal time: Disconnecting after work hours allows for pursuing passions, nurturing relationships, and simply recharging.
Cons of Quiet Quitting:
- Potential for stagnation: While setting boundaries is crucial, completely disengaging might hinder career growth and opportunities.
- Miscommunication and misunderstanding: ‘Quiet Quitting’ can be misconstrued as a lack of ambition or commitment if not communicated effectively.
The crux of the issue lies in the systemic factors contributing to this trend. Are workplaces fostering healthy boundaries, or are they implicitly demanding overwork?

Finding Balance: It’s Not About Quitting, It’s About Recalibrating

‘Quiet Quitting’, in its essence, is a cry for help—a plea for a more sustainable and humane work culture. It’s a reminder that our worth extends beyond our productivity, and that a fulfilling life requires balance.

Instead of viewing this as a trend to be demonized or romanticized, let’s use it as an opportunity for open dialogue and positive change. Employees should feel empowered to communicate their needs and set boundaries, while employers need to foster supportive environments that value well-being alongside performance.

The Takeaway: Healthy Boundaries, Not Quiet Quitting

The conversation shouldn’t be about ‘Quiet Quitting’, but about creating a work landscape where it’s no longer a silent outcry, but a natural rhythm of a healthy work-life integration. This requires a collective effort from both employers and employees to build a future where work is fulfilling, not all-consuming.

Let’s move beyond the buzzword and focus on the real issue: creating work environments that prioritize well-being and allow individuals to thrive both professionally and personally.
March 11, 2025
Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? What’s the Real Story?

The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“

“Quiet quitting” has become a buzzword, flooding our social media feeds and sparking countless debates about work-life balance. But is this phenomenon really about quitting on the sly, or is it something else entirely – a long overdue conversation about setting healthy boundaries?

Decoding the Quiet Quitting Trend

The term “quiet quitting” suggests a stealthy form of resignation, where employees mentally check out while physically remaining in their roles. It conjures images of disengaged workers doing the bare minimum, their motivation waning with each passing day.

On the surface, it might seem like a negative trend, indicative of a discontented workforce. However, a closer look reveals that “quiet quitting” often boils down to employees establishing boundaries between their professional and personal lives.

March 11, 2025
Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Are We Glorifying Burnout or Embracing Self-Care?
Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Are We Glorifying Burnout or Embracing Self-Care?

The Quiet Resignation: A New Workplace Trend

Remember “The Great Resignation,” when employees left jobs for better opportunities and work-life balance? Now, there’s “Quiet Quitting,” a buzzword sparking debate about employee expectations, company culture, and work-life boundaries.
Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Understanding the Difference
“Quiet quitting” means employees doing the bare minimum, not exceeding expectations. Some call it disengagement; others call it self-preservation in demanding cultures. This is where “setting boundaries” comes in – clearly communicating limits on workload and availability, advocating for well-being while staying a valuable team member.

Quiet Quitting or Healthy Boundaries? Decoding the Dilemma

The difference lies in approach and intention:

Quiet Quitting:
- Passive Resistance: Disengagement, lack of communication.
- Internalized Frustration: Driven by resentment, burnout, feeling undervalued.
- Potential Career Impact: Lack of initiative can be misinterpreted, hindering advancement.
Setting Boundaries:
- Proactive Communication: Openly communicating limits and expectations to supervisors and colleagues.
- Prioritizing Well-being: Creating sustainable work-life balance, preventing burnout.
- Fostering Respect: Clear communication builds a healthier work environment considering everyone’s needs.
March 11, 2025
Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? Why the Latest Work Trend Sparks Debate
The Silent Shift: Decoding Quiet Quitting

Is it a revolution in the workplace or just a fancy rebranding of an age-old concept? “Quiet quitting” has become the latest buzzword, sparking heated discussions about work-life balance, employee engagement, and the very nature of a job. But what exactly is it? Is it a mass exodus of disengaged workers silently rebelling against the grind, or is it simply about setting healthy boundaries?
Quiet Quitting Context
To understand the rise of quiet quitting, we need to look at the context in which it emerged. The past decade has seen the glorification of “hustle culture” – a relentless pursuit of success often at the expense of personal well-being. Social media feeds filled with productivity hacks and the pressure to be “always on” have blurred the lines between work and personal life. This has led to burnout, disengagement, and a growing desire among employees to reclaim their time and energy.

Enter “quiet quitting.” The term, which gained traction on social media platforms like TikTok, describes the act of doing the bare minimum at work – no more, no less. It’s about rejecting the idea that work should be the center of one’s life and instead choosing to prioritize personal time, hobbies, and relationships.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Unpacking the Debate

The debate around quiet quitting centers on whether it is a healthy response to an unsustainable work culture or a passive-aggressive form of protest that ultimately harms both employees and employers.

Arguments for Quiet Quitting:
- Prioritizing Well-being: Proponents argue that it’s a necessary act of self-preservation in a work environment that often demands more than what’s healthy or sustainable.
- Rejecting Hustle Culture: It challenges the notion that we should be defined by our productivity and encourages a healthier relationship with work.
- Reclaiming Personal Time: It allows individuals to invest in their passions, relationships, and overall well-being, leading to a more fulfilling life outside of work.
Arguments Against Quiet Quitting:
- Impact on Career Progression: Critics argue that doing the bare minimum can hinder career growth and limit opportunities for advancement.
- Lack of Communication: Quietly disengaging without communicating concerns can create resentment and misunderstandings within teams.
- Potential for Stagnation: While setting boundaries is crucial, completely checking out can lead to stagnation and a lack of professional fulfillment.
March 11, 2025
Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? What the Latest Work Trend Really Means
Is a silent epidemic sweeping through workplaces, or are we finally seeing a much-needed shift towards work-life balance? “Quiet quitting” has become a hot topic, sparking debates everywhere. But what does it really mean, and is it truly a new phenomenon?

The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“: A Sign of the Times?

The term “quiet quitting” gained traction in 2022, capturing the sentiment of employees who, feeling overworked and undervalued in a culture of hustle, decided to do the bare minimum at their jobs. Instead of outright quitting, they disengage emotionally, prioritize their well-being, and strictly adhere to their contracted hours.

This trend emerged in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which triggered a widespread reassessment of priorities and work-life balance. The pandemic blurred the lines between work and personal life, leading to increased burnout and a desire for greater autonomy and flexibility.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Unpacking the Nuances

While “quiet quitting” has become the catch-all term for this shift in employee behavior, it’s crucial to distinguish between disengagement and setting healthy boundaries.

Quiet Quitting:
- Disengagement: Characterized by apathy, minimal effort, and a lack of enthusiasm for work.
- Withdrawal: Reduced communication, avoiding extra responsibilities, and a general sense of detachment.
- Potential Negative Impact: Can hinder career progression, create a strained work environment, and ultimately be unsustainable in the long run.
Setting Boundaries:
- Prioritization: Clearly defining work hours, limiting overtime, and setting realistic expectations.
- Communication: Openly communicating boundaries with colleagues and supervisors to ensure mutual understanding.
- Sustainable Approach: Fosters a healthier work-life balance, reduces burnout, and promotes well-being without sacrificing productivity.
Reclaiming Your Time and Well-being: A Personal Perspective

In my opinion, the so-called “quiet quitting” trend is less about shirking responsibilities and more about reclaiming personal time and prioritizing well-being. It’s a sign that employees are no longer willing to sacrifice their health and happiness for the sake of a job.

While completely checking out mentally can be detrimental, setting clear boundaries is essential for a sustainable and fulfilling career. Employees deserve to have lives outside of work, pursue passions, and dedicate time to their mental and physical health.

Employers also have a role to play in fostering healthy boundaries. By promoting a culture of respect, work-life balance, and open communication, companies can create an environment where employees feel valued and empowered to thrive both personally and professionally.

Moving Beyond Quiet Quitting: Towards Healthy Engagement

Instead of viewing “quiet quitting” as a negative trend, perhaps it’s time to reframe the narrative. It’s an opportunity for both employees and employers to engage in a dialogue about creating healthier, more sustainable, and ultimately more fulfilling work experiences.

By embracing the principles of setting boundaries, open communication, and mutual respect, we can move beyond the limitations of “quiet quitting” and cultivate a work culture that prioritizes both productivity and well-being.
March 11, 2025
Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? The Shifting Landscape of Work-Life Balance

The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“: Disengagement or Self-Preservation?

The term “quiet quitting” is echoing through workplaces, but is it truly a new phenomenon? Or is it simply a new term for the age-old struggle to achieve work-life balance? This article delves into the evolving relationship between employees and their jobs, exploring the fine line between quiet quitting and setting healthy boundaries in today’s professional world.

Setting
The concept of “quiet quitting” gained momentum following the Great Resignation, a time when a record number of employees left their jobs. Burnout, lack of flexibility, and a desire for better work-life integration were major factors driving this trend. Quiet quitting, in this context, can be seen as a less extreme measure – a way for employees to remain in their positions while mentally disconnecting from the often-intense “hustle culture” prevalent in many industries.

However, critics argue that this interpretation is misleading. They contend that “quiet quitting” is simply a repackaging of setting boundaries, something employees have always done (or aspired to do) to safeguard their well-being. By equating boundary-setting with quitting, even quietly, they suggest that we risk stigmatizing healthy practices and perpetuating a culture of overwork.

Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Understanding the Difference

So, are we witnessing a surge in silent disengagement or a much-needed recalibration of expectations? The answer, as with most complex issues, is nuanced. Let’s break it down:

Quiet Quitting:

This often manifests as fulfilling only the minimum job requirements, withdrawing from additional responsibilities, and emotionally disengaging from work. While this can indicate deeper job dissatisfaction, it can also be a coping mechanism for an unsustainable workload or a toxic work environment.

Setting Boundaries:

This involves actively communicating and establishing clear limits on work hours, availability, and tasks. It’s about prioritizing personal well-being and ensuring personal time is respected. This approach is proactive and encourages open communication with employers.

March 11, 2025
Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? Navigating the New World of Work
Introduction: The Blur Between Work and Life

Is it “quiet quitting” or simply setting boundaries? This question has become a hot topic in the ever-evolving landscape of work. The lines between work life and personal life have blurred, particularly with the rise of remote and hybrid work models. Employees are grappling with burnout, demanding workloads, and a constant pressure to be “on.” In this climate, the concepts of “quiet quitting” and “boundary setting” have emerged as potential solutions, though often misunderstood.
Quitting vs. Boundary Setting
“Quiet quitting,” a term that gained traction on social media, typically refers to fulfilling only the bare minimum requirements of one’s job description and disengaging from any tasks or expectations that go above and beyond. It’s about doing just enough to not get fired, while mentally “checking out” from the hustle culture often associated with career advancement.

On the other hand, “setting boundaries” focuses on establishing clear parameters between work and personal life. It’s about proactively communicating your limits, protecting your time, and prioritizing your well-being without necessarily disengaging from work. This can involve declining meetings outside of work hours, taking regular breaks, or clearly defining your work responsibilities.

Analyzing the Approaches: Pros and Cons

While both concepts address the need for work-life balance, they differ significantly in their approach and potential outcomes:

Quiet Quitting: A Temporary Fix?
- Pros: Can provide temporary relief from burnout and reduce stress in the short term.
- Cons: Can lead to stagnation, lack of growth opportunities, and potential damage to professional reputation. It can also create resentment and hinder collaboration within teams.
Setting Boundaries: A Sustainable Solution?
- Pros: Promotes healthy work-life balance, reduces burnout, increases productivity, and fosters open communication with employers.
- Cons: Requires assertiveness and clear communication, which can be challenging for some. It also necessitates a supportive work environment that respects boundaries.
The Importance of Boundaries for a Fulfilling Career

I believe that “setting boundaries” is a crucial aspect of a healthy and sustainable work life. It’s not about doing less, but rather about working smarter and prioritizing your well-being. By clearly communicating your limits and advocating for your needs, you can create a work environment that supports both your professional growth and personal fulfillment.

Quiet quitting, on the other hand, can be a slippery slope. While it might provide temporary relief, it ultimately doesn’t address the root causes of burnout or dissatisfaction. In the long run, it can lead to career stagnation and hinder your professional development.

March 11, 2025
Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? What the Latest Workplace Trend Really Means
Quiet Quitting or Setting Boundaries? What the Latest Workplace Trend Really Means

The Rise of “Quiet Quitting“: A New Term for an Old Struggle

The internet loves a buzzword, and lately, “quiet quitting” has taken center stage in discussions about work-life balance and employee engagement. But is this phenomenon really a new wave of disengagement sweeping across workplaces, or are we just slapping a trendy label on the age-old desire for boundaries?

Beyond the Buzzword: Understanding the Context

The term “quiet quitting” itself can be misleading. It conjures images of employees stealthily withdrawing, barely doing the bare minimum while collecting a paycheck. However, the reality is often less dramatic. In many cases, “quiet quitting” simply describes employees who are no longer subscribing to the “hustle culture” mentality. They are choosing not to go above and beyond their job descriptions, prioritizing their personal time and well-being over climbing the corporate ladder.

This shift in attitude can be attributed to several factors, including:
- Burnout: The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated an already existing problem of workplace burnout. Employees are exhausted and less willing to sacrifice their personal lives for their jobs.
- The Great Resignation: As millions of employees re-evaluated their priorities during the pandemic, many decided to leave their jobs in search of better work-life balance and flexibility. This empowered those who stayed to demand more from their employers.
- Changing Values: Younger generations entering the workforce often prioritize personal fulfillment and purpose over traditional markers of success. They are less likely to buy into the idea that work should be their entire life.
Quiet Quitting vs. Setting Boundaries: Unpacking the Nuances

The crucial distinction to make is whether “quiet quitting” is a symptom of a disengaged workforce or simply a sign that employees are setting healthier boundaries.

On the one hand, if an employee is genuinely checked out, delivering subpar work, and neglecting their responsibilities, that’s a problem that needs addressing. This could indicate deeper issues like lack of growth opportunities, poor management, or a mismatch in skills and job requirements.

On the other hand, if “quiet quitting” translates to employees simply doing what is expected of them within their contracted hours, prioritizing their well-being, and declining to take on extra work without proper compensation or recognition, it can be viewed as a positive shift. This suggests employees are establishing healthy boundaries and advocating for their needs.

March 11, 2025